in Search
Welcome to World of Warcraft TCG & Minis Community Sign in | Join | Help

RQ, Michigan August 29

Last post 09-05-2009, 10:29 AM by Liek. 16 replies.
Page 1 of 2 (17 items)   1 2 Next >
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  08-30-2009, 2:54 PM 1824304

    RQ, Michigan August 29

    I decided to take a Matriana Mind wrench deck to the first RQ. I should have borrowed R.Levin's Eternums and taken a Gnome Rogue. The deck did not run enough hard-to-deal-with threats, and spleunker is too easily dealt with.


    R1: Jacob M playing JinRohk Pally.
    I thought I had good game here, but
    Game one, Ice Barbed Spear slowed me down miserably, and eventually he plonked me mostly to death with it, before finishing with 7 or so off a cloak of darkness.
    Game two I sided in 2 more pappy and 3 disperse(?) magic. And lost to a Jinrohk that was drawn as the 3rd card from a CTA: Arathi Basin, completed in response to a vampiric tendrils.

    R2: Steve L playing Orc Rogue
    Game one I have a strong vampiric tendrils, and win with a 22/22 spleunker.
    Game two I loose to a sideboarded Shuriken of Negation stealing tempo not once, but twice. Oops!
    Game three I seem to be in control, but he top decked a dealiness, dropping me by a resource and a slpeunker. Then, on a critical turn I didn't hold back a omens of terror, so couldn't finish off his treebole once it ran into my Jameson. Boo.


    R3: Phill C Gnome Rogue
    Game one I loose to his stable board presence, namely, Black amnesty and a hope ender, Dimzers, etc.
    Game two is more of the same: my threats do not answer his threats one for one, and eventually I am five-damaged to death, along with a 6 token hope ender.

    R4: Bye.
    I watch Phill C's match against a horde intimidation hunter, which was very interesting. Intimidation, the armor set, 10or so pets. etc. I forget who won, but it went to three games.

    On my left, I watched a cat (sorry I don't remember your name) playing a very interesting glass cannon horde holy priest deck. He runs a few will of the foresaken as well as blind faith, but I didn't see any gavels, which saddens me. I think he lost to being out drawn by a gnome warlock.

    Other decks there included: 2 (pretty sure gnome) warlock decks, a midrange(?) horde shaman, and a horde arena hunter deck.

    DECKLIST:
    4 Auchidon Spirit Towers
    4 Darkness Calling
    4 Rise and Be recognized
    3 Towers and Bunkers

    2 Splinter Mind
    3 owned!
    3 A Taste of Divinity
    4 Omens of Terror
    4 Mist of Corrosion
    4 Horrify
    4 Vampiric Tendrils

    2 Pappy Ironbane
    3 spleunker maddocks
    4 gromble the apt
    4 Royal Guardian Jameson
    4 Mikael the blunt

    SIDE:
    3 wub's
    3 disperse magic
    2 pappy
    2 splinter mind

    Conclusion:
    Not enough game changing and/or hard to deal with threats. And in two games, towers and bunkers only drew me one card, / was hard to turn on. And let's face it: every alliance deck should be running weldons and Adams. If they're not, they're missing amazing board presence.

    Changes:
    -3 owned!
    -4 Royal Guardian Jameson

    +4 Adam
    +3 Weldon

    Or
    +3 Nether shard
    +4 weldon

    Or
    Quickhands spigot gulp
    Weldon

    ETC.

    Thoughts?
    _______________________________
    * The other Phill C
    * Rank 4 Trader
  •  09-01-2009, 8:35 AM 1825039 in reply to 1824304

    Re: RQ, Michigan August 29

    Chad Gaynier won with Ryno, he beat Phil Cape playing Alliance Deadliness Rogue.

    There were 11 players and a cut to top 8. 
    3 Ryno (including myself) 1 horde priest with searing light, 1 horde hunter ocs + intimidation, 1 arena.dec, 1 horde enhance shaman, 1 horde deadliness rogue, 1 horde solo pally, 1 alliance deadliness rogue and 1 alliance priest.
  •  09-01-2009, 9:35 AM 1825078 in reply to 1825039

    Re: RQ, Michigan August 29

    Does anyone have the Ryno list that won?
  •  09-01-2009, 11:48 AM 1825185 in reply to 1825078

    Re: RQ, Michigan August 29

    It'll be in my article next week.

    Check out my Article Series "Tools of the Trade" here at wowtcg.com!
  •  09-01-2009, 5:13 PM 1825370 in reply to 1825185

    Re: RQ, Michigan August 29

    1326613:
    It'll be in my article next week.


    You never fail to disappoint :)

    Zapped Giants - UK Community Site, now with daily articles!
  •  09-02-2009, 11:54 AM 1825789 in reply to 1825370

    Re: RQ, Michigan August 29

    I'm assuming that is something that makes sense to British people. 

    Check out my Article Series "Tools of the Trade" here at wowtcg.com!
  •  09-02-2009, 12:00 PM 1825793 in reply to 1825789

    Re: RQ, Michigan August 29

    He's wanting info now, you're saying next week !
    Only two things are infinite......
  •  09-02-2009, 12:02 PM 1825796 in reply to 1825793

    Re: RQ, Michigan August 29

    Should of been a cut to the top 4 not 8 for only 11 players.
    WOWTCG Level 3 Rules Judge
    Player Management Level 2
    T.O.
  •  09-02-2009, 12:15 PM 1825802 in reply to 1825789

    Re: RQ, Michigan August 29

    1326613:
    I'm assuming that is something that makes sense to British people. 

    You (that's you Phil)
    never (ever ever)
    Fail (Epically, in fact)
    to (infinitive)
    Dissapoint (feeling of dissatisfaction that follows the failure of expectations to manifest)

    There. Simple. You always dis-satisfy people.

    Cheers.


    Come play at C & Js in Newark, CA
  •  09-02-2009, 12:19 PM 1825806 in reply to 1825802

    Re: RQ, Michigan August 29

    1189990:
    1326613:
    I'm assuming that is something that makes sense to British people. 

    You (that's you Phil)
    never (ever ever)
    Fail (Epically, in fact)
    to (infinitive)
    Dissapoint (feeling of dissatisfaction that follows the failure of expectations to manifest)

    There. Simple. You always dis-satisfy people.

    Cheers.

    Thats not what my girlfriend says!

    Check out my Article Series "Tools of the Trade" here at wowtcg.com!
  •  09-02-2009, 12:20 PM 1825809 in reply to 1825796

    Re: RQ, Michigan August 29

    893329:
    Should of been a cut to the top 4 not 8 for only 11 players.

    Judge said it was cut to top 8 regardless of size per a new policy document they recieved from upper deck. i didn't care, so i was cool with that.

    Check out my Article Series "Tools of the Trade" here at wowtcg.com!
  •  09-02-2009, 12:43 PM 1825824 in reply to 1825806

    Re: RQ, Michigan August 29

    1326613:
    1189990:
    1326613:
    I'm assuming that is something that makes sense to British people. 

    You (that's you Phil)
    never (ever ever)
    Fail (Epically, in fact)
    to (infinitive)
    Dissapoint (feeling of dissatisfaction that follows the failure of expectations to manifest)

    There. Simple. You always dis-satisfy people.

    Cheers.

    Thats not what my girlfriend says!

    That's because she already has access to the decklist :)

    Cheers.


    Come play at C & Js in Newark, CA
  •  09-03-2009, 8:45 AM 1826335 in reply to 1825824

    Re: RQ, Michigan August 29

    I should come up and check out a michigian event sometime. Sounds like you guys have a growing player base I would like to meet.
    WOWTCG Level 3 Rules Judge
    Player Management Level 2
    T.O.
  •  09-03-2009, 8:54 AM 1826340 in reply to 1826335

    Re: RQ, Michigan August 29

    Phil Fails
    The Brett Favre of WoW
  •  09-03-2009, 9:59 AM 1826369 in reply to 1826335

    Re: RQ, Michigan August 29

    893329:
    I should come up and check out a michigian event sometime. Sounds like you guys have a growing player base I would like to meet.


    Pandemonium's Battlegrounds start at 6pm on Tuesdays. Last Tuesday there were 11-13 of us, including three(?) Day 2 NACC'ers.

    The local scrubs aren't to scrubby, either.

    _______________________________
    * The other Phill C
    * Rank 4 Trader
Page 1 of 2 (17 items)   1 2 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML
 

Home | News | Upper Deck Store | Message Boards | Downloads | Contact | How to Play

©2006 The Upper Deck Company. “World of Warcraft” interactive game © 2004-2006 Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Warcraft, World of Warcraft and Blizzard Entertainment are trademarks and/or registered trademarks of Blizzard Entertainment, Inc., in the U.S. and/or other countries. All other trademarks referenced herein are the properties of their respected owners.

Blizzard Website