Upper Deck Entertainment Forums

Is there any updates in regards to the topic discussed here. http://entertainment.upperdeck.com/community/forums/thread/1816594.aspx

747828: 1914511: http://entertainment.upperdeck.com/wow/en/news/article.aspx?aid=6638 The ''offending'' deck just had a front-page article written about it.  Great, it should be loads of fun for people who decide to bring this deck to their local tournament, only to be told ''Sorry, you're getting a double-match-loss because the rules ...

Well, since you posted here, I'm assuming you speak and write English. What I'm assuming you're getting at is say, maybe my opponent speaks English, but only reads, say Korean. I don't think that would change anything policy wise, and most judges that I've met can read English, at least, I'd hope they can given that cards are printed in English. ...

1750316: 747828:First of all, I would have to say that, from the perspective of someone who has been both a player and a judge at large tournaments, Self-Destruct Button sounds like the most horrible idea for a card ever printed. Just a nightmare. Really, a card that just causes an auto-draw? One wonders what card designers are thinking ...

I apologize for double posting, but I was thinking. This whole situation is a problem due to the fact that matches are not allowed to end in a draw? While I don't really know the reason behind this, so I can't comment much, but maybe this instead warrant some discussion of changing the policy to allow match draws. Like I said, I don't really know ...

Let me try and recollect my thoughts here. What I'm arguing is this. I perfectly understand that it's no fault of the players that they got paired together, nor is it any fault that they are playing the exact same deck. Personally, I do feel, as someone who used to heavily play Self-Destruct Button (SDB is a card that automatically causes a draw in

747828: 1733232:Personally, I'd never buy into that as a player. What was the point of even playing the round to begin with it it's just going to be determined by chance. We may as well just role dice instead of having people play each other. I don't mean to be harsh, but all the dice rolling solution comes off as is an ''I don't know what to do, ...

747828: If some change is to be made, I would suggest the following:If the match is going exceedingly long, with neither player warranting personal slow play penalties (that is, both are playing at an efficient pace), then the players should be offered the option to randomly determine a winner. If both players agree, then a random winner may be ...

Alright, even if it possible this can happen, What are the actual odds of 2 random players, not only playing the exact same deck card for card, and getting paired together. Can it happen? Sure, however, unless this is a top match, I highly doubt the players are going to have the patience to sit there for hours on end. Second off, the venue owner ...

All situation would be assuming that the slip was marked correctly and that the error was on the scorekeeper.I guess what my main question is. Say round 1, the wrong result is entered. Round 2 is completed, pairings for round 3 are posted. The mistake is noticed and we fix the results and re-pair. How drastic of a change would fixing the error make