This actually came up during a recent SJC. A player had a list of sidedeck substitutions to make against diffeent matchups. This is clear cut UC-Cheating. There is no educate with a warning when they are purposefully doing something against the rules. Especially at such a high level event as Continentals. This is listed in the penalty guidelines as cheating. Rememberng what to sidedeck is part of the game. The notes gives him an unfair advantage over other people who are following the policies.
Even if he player was under the impression that it was allowed (which happened at the SJC, and he could prove he was under that impression) it's still UC-cheating. When it comes to writing the report to UDE, thats when you can make a suggestion along the lines of, "He thought it was ok, I believe the DQ is punishment enough and no suspension should be given." However that comes from the HJ's report.
To figure out what penalty to give someone, you find out what they did in the penalty guidelines. Then you look at that section and it tels you the penalty for the infraction. Don't try to reverse engineer infractions by deciding on the penalty frst then finding something in the penalty guidelines to justify it.
To unemployed101, you should've called a judge. Whenever your unsure on anything, call a judge. The judge will then proceed to investigate. This also falls under the player responsbilities in the tournament policies. It's better to be safe then sorry!
Your Friendly Neighbourhood Canadian Judge!
YGO RK L3
VS RK L2
WoW RK L1
PM L2