Here's something I thought would be fun. Midrange solo deck with warglaives. lots of recalling glaives through gear upgrade and stormrage signet for token fun. optional combo with onslaught girdle and bracers of green fortress. heroic strike for added awesomeness. Steelsmith to add another element of damage. Standard abilties apply.

 

Fallenstar

 

Abilities-

4- Gear Upgrade(1)

3- Heroic Strike(1)

2- Smash(2)

3- Sudden Death(2)

3- Puncture(3)

2- Beserker Rage(4)

2- Bloodrage(5)

Total-19

                                                                       

Allies-

4- Steelsmith Joseph Caroll(1)

Total-4

 

Equipment-

Weapons-

4- Warglaive (R)(4)

4- Warglaive (L)(5)

2- Felsteel Reaper(9)

Armor-

2- The Hands of Fate(2)

2- Borak’s Belt of Bravery(2)

2- Stronghold Gauntlets(3)

2- Bracers of the Green Fortress(3)

2- Onslaught Girdle(4)

Items-

3- Healing Potion(1)

2- Stormrage Signet Ring(4)

Total- 25

 

Quests-

4- Cipher of Damnation(2)

3- Information Gathering(3)

2- Big Game Hunter(2)

2- Deep Sea Salvage(4)

2- Sunken Treasure(3)

Total- 13

 

Total- 61

Side Deck-10

1- Puncture(3)

3- Wreck(1)

3- Pummel(3)

3- Deafening Shout(7)

 

---

Alan

Looks pretty good.
You could also take it horde and run rak instead of steelsmith.

---

Mask, 70 rogue Lightninghoof server

I could be wrong, but I'm thinking 3 & 3 will end up being the right number of Warglaives to run.

---

4th Place, Day 1 US Continentals 2008 (22nd place overall)
1st Place, Ashenvale Realm Champs 2008
1st Place, Seattle Regionals (7/5/08)
1st Place, Seattle Regionals (5/31/08)
1st Place, Spectral Safari (3/1/08)
1st Place, Seattle Regionals (1/12/08)

I don't mind having 4 because all that means is I can replace the copy to get a token which can't do anything but help.

Edit.- I just noticed that with both warglaives and skibi's pendant out is infinate damage as long as the attack goes through hehe

---

Alan

I reckon 4 and 3. 4 of the 0-strike cost one.

You might wanna add Vindicator's Brands. Gives you a way to destroy abilities outside of Berserker Rage (which is fairly limited and overcosted anyhow).

---

Varak:

My opponent played conjured cinamon roll. my turn comes along and i play nyn'jah's tabi boots. I choose to use the payment power of his cinamon roll to gain control of it. but he has loly the unsuspecting out.

1287839:

Edit.- I just noticed that with both warglaives and skibi's pendant out is infinate damage as long as the attack goes through hehe

Nope sorry. Think 'Self Reference'. The Right Hand will only ready the Left. The Left won't ready the Right.

Cheers.

---

Man Utd to retain the Premiership!!
Latest result: Aston Villa 0 Man Utd 0 (better than Arsenal!!!)
My most recent High Level result: 3-4 DMF Anaheim
Level 1 TCG AND Minis Rules

They don't specify which hand, it just refers to a warglaive in general. It dosen't exclude self referenace. I am willing to bet a judge would rule in favor of the way the card reads.  I mean keep in mind it's a three card combo.. the likelyhood it would see tourney play is not high. Also keep in mind the desginers wanted  a legendary effect from the items.. that would meet that requirement lol.

---

Alan

Please search the Rules forum. There is a comprehensive rules quote that says 'when a card has text referencing a subset of it's title, it is specifically referencing itself'.

I thought like you until someone showed the Comp Rules.

Cheers.

---

Man Utd to retain the Premiership!!
Latest result: Aston Villa 0 Man Utd 0 (better than Arsenal!!!)
My most recent High Level result: 3-4 DMF Anaheim
Level 1 TCG AND Minis Rules

1287839:

They don't specify which hand, it just refers to a warglaive in general. It dosen't exclude self referenace. I am willing to bet a judge would rule in favor of the way the card reads.  I mean keep in mind it's a three card combo.. the likelyhood it would see tourney play is not high. Also keep in mind the desginers wanted  a legendary effect from the items.. that would meet that requirement lol.

If any judge rules in favor of that, they should stop judging.

---

West Brom for the Premiership
Latest Result: WBA 0 Chelsea 3
2nd highest-ranked Limited player in Northwest Brooklyn
#2 Lifetime Honor scrub (#1 in '08!)
Lifetime Regional/RCQ match record: 88-64 (57.9%)

its not really that powerful.. the fastest it could win is turn 4 with a god hand.. thats no faster that warriors or rogues have been in the past.  Besides it's a 4 card perfect combo that would mean your opponent is brain dead not to stop.

T1 Andiss

T2 Tarwilla

T3 Warglaive

T4 Warglaive

---

Alan

1296367:

1287839:

They don't specify which hand, it just refers to a warglaive in general. It dosen't exclude self referenace. I am willing to bet a judge would rule in favor of the way the card reads.  I mean keep in mind it's a three card combo.. the likelyhood it would see tourney play is not high. Also keep in mind the desginers wanted  a legendary effect from the items.. that would meet that requirement lol.

If any judge rules in favor of that, they should stop judging.

 

not saying the ruling dosen't exist just saying the wording on the card leaves room for it to be possible. Btw not that I don't beleive you, I'm just too tired to search for the the subsection can you copy the section?

---

Alan

1287839:

1296367:

1287839:

They don't specify which hand, it just refers to a warglaive in general. It dosen't exclude self referenace. I am willing to bet a judge would rule in favor of the way the card reads.  I mean keep in mind it's a three card combo.. the likelyhood it would see tourney play is not high. Also keep in mind the desginers wanted  a legendary effect from the items.. that would meet that requirement lol.

If any judge rules in favor of that, they should stop judging.

not saying the ruling dosen't exist just saying the wording on the card leaves room for it to be possible.

There's isn't flexibility on game rules. It's either right or it's not. This is not. I don't even know what you're really arguing.

---

West Brom for the Premiership
Latest Result: WBA 0 Chelsea 3
2nd highest-ranked Limited player in Northwest Brooklyn
#2 Lifetime Honor scrub (#1 in '08!)
Lifetime Regional/RCQ match record: 88-64 (57.9%)

not arguing.. not nearly as well versed in the game as some of you :)  I'm an above average casual player.  Not saying that i'm right ... just want clarification is all.

 

regardless of the infinity debate hows the deck look?

---

Alan

if anything i  would change the hero to blaine and play 3 main deck armed to the teeth,because fallenstar has no answers to bringer of death while you have bracers of the green fortress. other than that i would probably main deck vindicators brand, wreck, and shield slam. i really think that a retooled version of the block deck would do really well.

cheers,

craig

http://entertainment.upperdeck.com/WOW/COMMUNITY/forums/thread/1442015.aspx

200.1 A card’s name is printed above its art. If a link, modifier, or cost refers to the name of its source, or any part of that name, it’s referring only to that source and not to any other card with that name. Such references are called “self-references.”

---

"Rozen Queen"